Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A difference of 2 points after 33 games proves nothing

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 15:59:31 11/27/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 2001 at 09:27:31, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>From own experience I know that Gandalf is a nasty opponent for Gambit Tiger2.
>But as already mentioned, a difference of 2 points after 33 games does not prove
>anything. It could happen, that GT_2 is going to win the next five games in a
>row!!
>Regards
>Kurt

Hi Kurt,

I look in my database, games from different people, not all from me.
Gandalf 4.32h made after ~ 130 games against Gambit-Tiger ~58% with longer time
controls on different system. Against Chess Tiger 14.0 after 78 games only 48%.

Against Shredder 5.0 48%
Against Fritz 6, 53%
Against Nimzo 7 and 8, 62%
Against Hiarcs 7, 54%
Against Junior 7, 42%
Against Junior 6, 47%

After all games which I have with versions 4.32f, 4.32g, 4.32h

Against Crafty (different versions), 52%
Against Yace (different versions), 52%

The result vs. Gambit-Tiger is normaly, think so ...

Best
Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.