Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 16:56:32 11/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2001 at 19:51:03, Mike S. wrote: >On November 27, 2001 at 18:02:00, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>Mr Blass while it may be true that the first version of Fritz 7 was not >>as good as the second version 17...Qxh3?? is an outright blunder .I have >>played enough games against computers and analyzed enough games with them to >>know that things like 17...Qxh3 are not possible. > >You say you don't have Fritz 7 but still you claim Qxh3 is a fake?! > >It's not. I have resurrected the 1st engine version of Fritz 7 (7a doesn't play >Qh3 anymore): > >New game - Fritz 7 >r1b2rk1/pppp1ppp/2n5/3B4/2Q5/4q2N/PPP4P/1K1R1R2 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 7: > >17...Qxh3 18.Bxf7+ > -+ (-2.60) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 136kN > ± (1.25) Depth: 12/40 00:02:57 64690kN > > >Btw. Eduard has pointed to that type of dubious moves (of the 1st F7 engine) >himself in his comments. Maybe you didn't read that; I don't know if it was >included in the postings here or only in CSS Forum. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl Are you saying that the first version sticks with 17...Qxh3??? after 5 or 10 seconds? Please explain
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.