Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 15:48:39 11/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2001 at 13:47:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 28, 2001 at 03:38:59, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On November 27, 2001 at 12:25:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>Deep mistakes are _common_ from a computer's perspective. You might think >>>they are "tactically supreme" but there are _lots_ of endgame positions where >>>they are clueless. And any time you reach such a position, where either it is >>>(commonly) a long-range kingside attack (or less commonly) a deep endgame >>>tactic, you get random reports. >>> >>>I simply personlly don't like anything "random" when somebody/something is >>>supposed to be telling me where I went wrong. >> >>Well, without any more information than your gut feelings, I will continue to >>believe that the depth of mistakes is evenly distributed. >> >>-Tom > > >I believe that is what _I_ said. Some are one move beyond the search >horizon, some are 20+ moves beyond. Isn't that "distributed". And the Distribution between ~13 and infinity is not "even." Duh. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.