Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 04:00:53 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 06:41:00, Tina Long wrote: >On December 01, 2001 at 06:20:23, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On December 01, 2001 at 06:12:35, Ian Aston wrote: >> >>>On December 01, 2001 at 05:34:19, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>Click here to watch the games live: >>>>http://users.cybercity.dk/~dsl53055 >>>> >>>>This is the last 2 games of 10 Games played between F7a v GT2.0 (agg) >>>> >>>>Game details: >>>> >>>>2x Athlon MP 1600+ (1400 Mhz) 256 ddr ram, win2k. >>>>40/40+40/40+40 >>>>Fritz7a with: 32Mb hash >>>>GT2.0 with: 48Mb hash >>>>Both using Fritz7.ctg >>>>Ponder=on! >>>>3+4+most 5 men tb's >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>>Maybe I am missing something obvious but I can't seem to find out what the >>>current score is in this series of games. >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Ian Aston >> >>Sorry i should have mentioned that. The score after 8 games is: >> >>F7a v GT2.0 5.0 - 3.0 >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Hi Jonas, >Just wondering at the Hash settings. Do you have any special reason for them >being different? I thought at average 1minute per move, and considering the >machines, you might give them both 64 or even 128Meg. > >And does running Tablebases use up any available RAM? > >Thank You >Tina I had to buy some very expensive RAM, so only room for 256 at this point, when ponder=on, too much ram for both engines slows down the whole thing, therefore i figured that 32 and 48 was no handicap, compared to the fact that it is Ponder=on. Infact i don't believe that a lot of ram will do a noticable difference unless it is really long timecontrols. Just my opinion, i might be wrong. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.