Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 10:18:47 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 12:55:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 01, 2001 at 11:46:16, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On December 01, 2001 at 10:13:54, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On December 01, 2001 at 09:52:54, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On November 30, 2001 at 18:59:45, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi! >>>>> >>>>>I can't tell for sure if it is a problem with this match, but that has been >>>>>known for a long time that the matches are played with the four Turbo-Cds from >>>>>Chessbase and some programs handle this wright and some don't. I haven't seen >>>>>this problem in about 200 games with the Tigers but Paul has seen it in several >>>>>games. The main reason that the Tigers (eventually) miss the first place is the >>>>>missing knowledge, that rook and bishop and rook and knight vs rook can't win in >>>>>most endgames. I have seen the Tigers incorrectly exchange down to these >>>>>endgames in several (in fact surprisingigly often) cases. >>>> >>>>So, do you think that Tiger would exchange IF Tiger had ALL TBs and would see >>>>that this 5-man is draw? >>> >>>The problem is that it exchanges down to in example rook and bishop vs rook and >>>pawn and believe it is winning. >>>I believe it is necessary to include this knowledge and for example wrong >>>coloured bishops in the programs otherwise they plays incorrectly when there is >>>one or more pieces included. >> >> >>I don't know how you have configured Tiger, but a correct configured Tiger >>plays 87.b8=Q (1-0) and not 87.Ra6+ (draw). >> >>Ed > >I guess that tiger used the KRP vs KR but not the KRQ vs KR. > >Uri If so Tiger still plays the good 87.b8=Q (1-0) and not 87.Ra6+ (draw). Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.