Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:34:54 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 07:47:24, James Stacey wrote:
>If you don't mind me saying, your post looks a bit like sour grapes. Why can't
>you just admit that Gambit Tiger is no stronger than Gandalf. Instead of trying
>to find excuses, why don't you give some credit to Gandalf. I am sure that many
>hours of time have gone into the programming and testing of Gandalf also.
>
>Best Regards
>
>James Stacey
Naturally, Gandalf is an excellent engine. Not only that, but Gandalf is also in
my team, the Schröder team.
However I don't think Steen wants to get a good performance because its opponent
has been crippled. I guess that, like me, he want to perform well when fair
conditions have been set.
My comments are not aimed at Gandalf. I would have complained the same way if
the opponent had been another program.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.