Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 12:35:14 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 13:34:54, Christophe Theron wrote: >On December 01, 2001 at 07:47:24, James Stacey wrote: > >>If you don't mind me saying, your post looks a bit like sour grapes. Why can't >>you just admit that Gambit Tiger is no stronger than Gandalf. Instead of trying >>to find excuses, why don't you give some credit to Gandalf. I am sure that many >>hours of time have gone into the programming and testing of Gandalf also. >> >>Best Regards >> >>James Stacey > > > >Naturally, Gandalf is an excellent engine. Not only that, but Gandalf is also in >my team, the Schröder team. > >However I don't think Steen wants to get a good performance because its opponent >has been crippled. I guess that, like me, he want to perform well when fair >conditions have been set. > >My comments are not aimed at Gandalf. I would have complained the same way if >the opponent had been another program. > > > > Christophe That's all well said Chris, but what would you do if such a problem happens in CT14 - GT2 match? :) Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.