Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 12:49:38 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 15:35:14, Ed Schröder wrote:
>On December 01, 2001 at 13:34:54, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On December 01, 2001 at 07:47:24, James Stacey wrote:
>>
>>>If you don't mind me saying, your post looks a bit like sour grapes. Why can't
>>>you just admit that Gambit Tiger is no stronger than Gandalf. Instead of trying
>>>to find excuses, why don't you give some credit to Gandalf. I am sure that many
>>>hours of time have gone into the programming and testing of Gandalf also.
>>>
>>>Best Regards
>>>
>>>James Stacey
>>
>>
>>
>>Naturally, Gandalf is an excellent engine. Not only that, but Gandalf is also in
>>my team, the Schröder team.
>>
>>However I don't think Steen wants to get a good performance because its opponent
>>has been crippled. I guess that, like me, he want to perform well when fair
>>conditions have been set.
>>
>>My comments are not aimed at Gandalf. I would have complained the same way if
>>the opponent had been another program.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>That's all well said Chris, but what would you do if such a problem happens
>in CT14 - GT2 match?
>
>:)
>
>Ed
I would complain as well. Maybe even more. Gathering data about Chess Tiger vs
Gambit Tiger is even more essential for me and the evolution of the Tiger
engine. I definitely don't want to collect wrong data caused by a wrong setup.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.