Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 12:52:53 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 05:08:15, Steve Maughan wrote:
>What's your opinion on Genius for the Palm? This program is based on the Roma
>program (identical) that has a rating on SSDF of 1870 on a 12 MHz processor.
>
>http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/rlwww013.txt
>
>This rating is based on 1500 games i.e. is significant. On the faster Palm
>hardware, and considering that the Swedish list was adjusted downwards by 100
>ELO, it is reasonable to estimate the strength of Genius on the Palm as 1950 -
>2000 ELO. Since Tiger on the Palm is most likely at least as good as Genius, it
>looks a little weak to claim that Tiger is 1600. Probably the weakest link in
>this logic is that Tiger is at least as good as Genius but I haven't heard
>anyone claim anything to the contrary.
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve
I would add that there is some significant evidence that Tiger for Palm is
better than Genius for Palm.
http://www.chesstiger.com/faq.html
But I do not think that this evidence will do anything to change the minds of
those who just want to troll.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.