Author: Slater Wold
Date: 14:51:40 12/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 15:18:19, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On December 01, 2001 at 15:02:43, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On December 01, 2001 at 07:00:53, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On December 01, 2001 at 06:41:00, Tina Long wrote: >>> >>>>On December 01, 2001 at 06:20:23, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 01, 2001 at 06:12:35, Ian Aston wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 01, 2001 at 05:34:19, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Click here to watch the games live: >>>>>>>http://users.cybercity.dk/~dsl53055 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is the last 2 games of 10 Games played between F7a v GT2.0 (agg) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Game details: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>2x Athlon MP 1600+ (1400 Mhz) 256 ddr ram, win2k. >>>>>>>40/40+40/40+40 >>>>>>>Fritz7a with: 32Mb hash >>>>>>>GT2.0 with: 48Mb hash >>>>>>>Both using Fritz7.ctg >>>>>>>Ponder=on! >>>>>>>3+4+most 5 men tb's >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Regards >>>>>>>Jonas >>>>>> >>>>>>Maybe I am missing something obvious but I can't seem to find out what the >>>>>>current score is in this series of games. >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards >>>>>> >>>>>>Ian Aston >>>>> >>>>>Sorry i should have mentioned that. The score after 8 games is: >>>>> >>>>>F7a v GT2.0 5.0 - 3.0 >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Jonas >>>> >>>>Hi Jonas, >>>>Just wondering at the Hash settings. Do you have any special reason for them >>>>being different? I thought at average 1minute per move, and considering the >>>>machines, you might give them both 64 or even 128Meg. >>>> >>>>And does running Tablebases use up any available RAM? >>>> >>>>Thank You >>>>Tina >>> >>>I had to buy some very expensive RAM, so only room for 256 at this point, when >>>ponder=on, too much ram for both engines slows down the whole thing, therefore i >>>figured that 32 and 48 was no handicap, compared to the fact that it is >>>Ponder=on. Infact i don't believe that a lot of ram will do a noticable >>>difference unless it is really long timecontrols. Just my opinion, i might be >>>wrong. >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >>Not sure what "very expensive" RAM you're talking about, but I have 1024MB, and >>have used 256MB for each engine and never had a problem. > >In a couple of month's i will have 1024MB too, they are 120$ per 256mb, i call >that expensive :) > >Regards >Jonas When I bought my memory, I got 1024MB for $265. That was certified & registered. Brand name. And I am seeing places in America selling the same exact thing for $36 for a 256MB stick. (I have 4 256MB sticks.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.