Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 08:29:47 12/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2001 at 15:36:39, Roy Eassa wrote: >Ali created the problem, saying that it would not be considered solved until a >program could demonstrate that it saw the "whole" line up front. Thus, HIS >puzzle was not solved. A different puzzle, that you derived from his puzzle, >apparently was. (Gandalf was the only one to solve Ali's puzzle, at least that >I've seen so far.) He attached a relation to it which is somehow supposed to say something about the performance of chessplaying programs. I say this is complete, pure and utter nonsense. As far as I am concerned, my program can play Nxg6 and display a PV wherein it sacs its queen and all minor pieces to be mated itself on the last move. I don't care as long as it plays Nxg6. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.