Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 09:38:03 12/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
Not an easy one, but this is the result ofFrtiz 7.002. Analysis by Fritz 7: 1...Bxd4 2.exd4 Qh6 3.Qc1 e3 4.fxe3 Qh4+ 5.Rf2 Rae8 = (0.12) Depth: 7/22 00:00:00 248kN 1...a5! = (0.09) Depth: 7/23 00:00:00 532kN 1...a5 2.0-0-0 a4 3.b4 Bxb4 4.Nxe4 Nxe4 5.Bxe4 Rfd8 = (-0.07) Depth: 8/24 00:00:01 839kN 1...a5 2.0-0-0 a4 3.Bxf6 Nxf6 4.Nxa4 Ba3+ 5.Kb1 b5 6.Nc3 bxc4 7.Nxe4 = (0.12) Depth: 9/27 00:00:03 1704kN 1...Bxd4! = (0.09) Depth: 9/27 00:00:03 1758kN 1...Bxd4 2.exd4 Qh6 3.Qd2 Rae8 4.Qe3 c5 5.dxc5 Qxe3+ 6.fxe3 Nxc5 7.g5 Nd3+ 8.Kd2 = (0.21) Depth: 10/31 00:00:08 5080kN 1...Ba3! = (0.18) Depth: 10/31 00:00:15 9359kN 1...Ba3! = (0.03) Depth: 10/31 00:00:16 9776kN 1...Ba3 2.Nxe4 Nxe4 3.Qxe4 Rad8 4.g5 Bb4+ 5.Kd1 Qxe4 6.Bxe4 Nc5 7.Bg2 Bc3 8.Rb1 Bxd4 = (0.03) Depth: 11/28 00:00:20 12406kN 1...Ba3 2.Nb1 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 c5 4.Bxf6 Nxf6 5.0-0-0 Bxc3 6.Qxc3 a5 7.Qe5 Rfe8 8.Qxc5 a4 = (0.03) Depth: 12/34 00:00:42 26351kN 1...Ba3 2.Nb1 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 Ba3 4.Nb1 Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Ba3 6.Nb1 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 Ba3 8.Nb1 Bb4+ = (0.00) Depth: 13/35 00:01:05 41188kN 1...Ba3 2.Nb1 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 a5 4.0-0-0 a4 5.Nxe4 Nxe4 6.Bxe4 axb3 7.axb3 Nc5 8.Kb2 Ra3 = (0.03) Depth: 14/38 00:02:28 93762kN 1...Ba3 2.Nb1 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 Ba3 4.Nb1 Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Ba3 6.Nb1 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 Ba3 8.Nb1 Bb4+ = (0.00) Depth: 15/40 00:05:08 196829kN 1...Ba3 2.Nb1 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 c5 4.Bxf6 Nxf6 5.0-0-0 Bxc3 6.Qxc3 Rfe8 7.Kb1 g5 8.f3 exf3 = (0.03) Depth: 16/41 00:14:56 570610kN 1...Ba3 2.Nb1 Bc5 3.Nc3 b5 4.Nxe4 Bxd4 5.exd4 Nxe4 6.Bxe4 bxc4 7.bxc4 Qg5 8.f4 Qh4+ = (0.00) Depth: 17/44 00:39:57 1530178kN 1...b5! = (-0.04) Depth: 17/44 01:13:38 2824209kN 1...b5 2.Bxf6 Nxf6 3.0-0-0 bxc4 4.Nxe4 Nxe4 5.Bxe4 Ba3+ 6.Kb1 cxb3 7.axb3 Rad8 8.Ka2 Be7 = (-0.10) Depth: 18/49 03:50:15 8861943kN (Celeron Tualatin 1,2 GHz, 832MB hash, 3,4 and 5 piece EGTB's 02.12.2001) Ernst. On December 02, 2001 at 10:48:54, Andrew Smith wrote: >On December 02, 2001 at 07:01:02, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On December 02, 2001 at 05:03:52, Andrew Smith wrote: >> >>>I recently came across this interesting test suite, which seems to be quite >>>difficult for programs. I played through the first two positions, and it seems >>>that the answers are very deep, but I am not sure if they are all correct. Has >>>anybody ran a strong program on fast hardware through these positions? (I'm >>>talking about the first part, I think there are three of them) If so, what >>>results did you get? I will post two positions here, which look interesting. >>> >>>[D]r4rk1/pp1n1pp1/2p2np1/2b5/2PBp1Pq/1PN1P2P/P1Q2PB1/R3KR2 w KQkq - 0 1 >>> >>>b5!!? >> >>b5 is illegal. > >Sorry, the fen is wrong, it's black to move
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.