Author: Tina Long
Date: 14:29:03 12/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2001 at 08:54:11, Dr. Franklin wrote: >On December 01, 2001 at 03:03:14, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>Maby if your very strong statement, was not only bgased on ONE game. >> >>Regards >>Jonas > > > > No it was not based on one game, but atleast 10, I only posted one. Just play >the thing yourself, anyone can see the thing is no where near 2100 elo. It's a >joke for Chrisopher to continue with that bull. I don't even think it is Tiger >14, it should make the same moves as the micro program, if you let it think for >hours, but this is not the case. Posted by Dr. Franklin (Profile) on November 29, 2001 at 22:49:04: It's more like 1600 fide at best, this is false advertisement to suggest that the palm is 2100, I am not even an expert and I beat the thing effortlessly, will post the game shortly "will post THE game shortly" If You beat a program efortlessly 10 times, I think you should mention that at the start to strengthen your case. Until now we thought you were talking about just one game. If you beat it 10 times then either: You are better than you think; Something is wrong with the hardware speed; The program really is that weak. It would be very interesting to see all the games, so that we can see how this program loses. Regards, Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.