Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: There goes the surprise ...

Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba

Date: 04:57:11 12/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 01, 2001 at 23:06:28, Christophe Theron wrote:


>
>I'm sorry but this is the responsability of the testers.
>
>It is common knowledge of programmers that 12Kb of hash tables is inferior to
>192Mb.
>
>So if the tester wants to use 12Kb of hash table, should the program:
>1) use 12Kb?
>2) refuse to run?
>3) use 192Mb no matter what?
>
>I can already hear the complains if I program 2 or 3...
>
>There are many ways to set up a program incorrectly. The programs generally are
>able to catch a number of common cases, but not all of them.
>
>And some of the incorrect setups for long time controls can be absolutely
>correct in some other circumstances (tests on positions only, bullet games...).
>
>What is the SSDF testing? The real strength of chess programs or their ability
>to recover from bad setups?
>
>
>
>    Christophe

I remember that in the past you strongly supported the SSDF. Have you changed
your mind?
José.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.