Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: World championship titles

Author: Komputer Korner

Date: 20:46:57 06/04/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 04, 1998 at 18:29:13, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>I wish folks would use the titles they win, without embellishing them,
>and I wish they would state they year that they win them, unless they
>won them this year.
>
>The most recent example is the inside last page of the USCF magazine,
>"Chess Life".
>
>This is a Virtual Chess 64 ad that claims that the program was "1996 &
>1997 world microcomputer chess champion".
>
>Let's say that you participate in a sport, and that you are good enough
>to win a world championship title.  Then you do the same thing the next
>year.  What does this imply about you and about your competition?  It
>implies that there is a gap between you and the competition.
>
>So the ad leaves the reader with the idea that Virtual Chess is better
>than the competition.
>

May I remind everyone that I always said the title of world
professional/commercial champion was a fraudulent title. There should
only be one title and that is World Computer Chess Champion.
>But the problem here is that Virtual Chess was not the "world
>microcomputer chess champion" in either of those years.
>
>The 1996 world microcomputer chess champion was Shredder, and the 1997
>world microcomputer chess champion was Junior.
>
>The reason that they can say "champion" is that there was a title given
>in both of those years to the highest finishing *professional* chess
>program, this was the "world professional microcomputer chess champion".
> This is an extremely important distinction.
>
>In 1997 the highest finishing professional program was Virtual Chess,
>who finished second overall, and in 1996 it was also Virtual Chess, who
>finished in a tie for 5th through 7th.  Fritz was 7th on tie break
>points, there was a playoff, and Virtual Chess won.
>
>But the ad does not say "world professional microcomputer chess
>champion" in one very prominent place, it says "world microcomputer
>chess champion".  This is misleading, and I have to believe damaging to
>those who really won these titles in those years, and damaging to others
>who have programs that are in the same league with Virtual Chess, and in
>fact may have finished higher than Virtual Chess in at least one of
>these tournaments.
>
>I ask that people who win titles please make use of the titles
>responsibly and accurately.  Those who have won less restrictive titles
>do not need to have their reputation eroded by others who conveniently
>forget to insert the appropriate restrictive adjective.
>
>bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.