Author: Slater Wold
Date: 13:28:08 12/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2001 at 15:35:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 03, 2001 at 11:23:41, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On December 03, 2001 at 11:02:20, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>> >>>So, to summarize: >>> >>>I am right because I am right and you are wrong. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>I've been here for over 2 years, and that has to be the most ridiculous post >>I've ever seen. >> >>Bottom line: >> >>You said no program could see it; and Dann found one. Regardless of why it >>chooses this line, it found it. Period. Your arguement (to a sensible person) >>ends there. >> >>If you'd like to see some positions that computers 1.) cannot understand and/or >>2.) cannot solve, I recommend the Nolot suite. > >I also posted positions that the program that I have cannot understand but I do >not do a big noise out of them. > >My experience in correspondence games tell me that programs are not god and >I posted at least one position when all the programs that I have do not >understand. I know for fact there are thousands and thousands of positions that computers have no idea what's going on. This obviously was not the case.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.