Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New Endgame Test Suite

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 15:44:16 12/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 03, 2001 at 15:15:18, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On December 03, 2001 at 14:42:13, Peter McKenzie wrote:
>[snip]
>>A c0?  Sorry for my ignorance, is that part of the epd standard?
>>Perhaps you could give me an example?  Thanks.
>
>c0 is the first comment.
>c1 is the second, etc.
>
>[D]4k3/1Q5Q/2q2q2/1qnqqnq1/1Qqbbq1Q/3NBN2/1Q1NBN1Q/1r1RKR1r b - - bm Nxd3+; c0
>"Mate in 7";

Thanks for this position
It probably is going to help me to find more bugs in my move generator

my move generator found that perft 4=32,511,624 when yace said that it is only
32,511,622

I guess that yace is right.
I will investigate the problem later.

I did not know that my move generator has bugs except not generating un passant
moves in reply to check and generating illegal unpassant moves when the pawn is
not pinned and it is clearly not relevant in this case.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.