Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New Endgame Test Suite

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 15:48:59 12/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 03, 2001 at 18:44:16, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 03, 2001 at 15:15:18, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On December 03, 2001 at 14:42:13, Peter McKenzie wrote:
>>[snip]
>>>A c0?  Sorry for my ignorance, is that part of the epd standard?
>>>Perhaps you could give me an example?  Thanks.
>>
>>c0 is the first comment.
>>c1 is the second, etc.
>>
>>[D]4k3/1Q5Q/2q2q2/1qnqqnq1/1Qqbbq1Q/3NBN2/1Q1NBN1Q/1r1RKR1r b - - bm Nxd3+; c0
>>"Mate in 7";
>
>Thanks for this position
>It probably is going to help me to find more bugs in my move generator

I am guessing it was composed by leonid.

>my move generator found that perft 4=32,511,624 when yace said that it is only
>32,511,622
>
>I guess that yace is right.
>I will investigate the problem later.
>
>I did not know that my move generator has bugs except not generating un passant
>moves in reply to check and generating illegal unpassant moves when the pawn is
>not pinned and it is clearly not relevant in this case.

Beowulf says:
[1]W > setboard 4k3/1Q5Q/2q2q2/1qnqqnq1/1Qqbbq1Q/3NBN2/1Q1NBN1Q/1r1RKR1r b - -
[1]B > perft 4
Progress :
......................................................................................
Total: 32511622 Moves
14.65 Seconds





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.