Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 16:00:44 12/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2001 at 18:48:59, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 03, 2001 at 18:44:16, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 03, 2001 at 15:15:18, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On December 03, 2001 at 14:42:13, Peter McKenzie wrote: >>>[snip] >>>>A c0? Sorry for my ignorance, is that part of the epd standard? >>>>Perhaps you could give me an example? Thanks. >>> >>>c0 is the first comment. >>>c1 is the second, etc. >>> >>>[D]4k3/1Q5Q/2q2q2/1qnqqnq1/1Qqbbq1Q/3NBN2/1Q1NBN1Q/1r1RKR1r b - - bm Nxd3+; c0 >>>"Mate in 7"; >> >>Thanks for this position >>It probably is going to help me to find more bugs in my move generator > >I am guessing it was composed by leonid. > >>my move generator found that perft 4=32,511,624 when yace said that it is only >>32,511,622 >> >>I guess that yace is right. >>I will investigate the problem later. >> >>I did not know that my move generator has bugs except not generating un passant >>moves in reply to check and generating illegal unpassant moves when the pawn is >>not pinned and it is clearly not relevant in this case. > >Beowulf says: >[1]W > setboard 4k3/1Q5Q/2q2q2/1qnqqnq1/1Qqbbq1Q/3NBN2/1Q1NBN1Q/1r1RKR1r b - - >[1]B > perft 4 >Progress : >...................................................................................... >Total: 32511622 Moves >14.65 Seconds Gaviota agrees: perft 4 depth 0: leaves: 1 accum: 1 depth 1: leaves: 86 accum: 87 depth 2: leaves: 6189 accum: 6276 depth 3: leaves: 448732 accum: 455008 depth 4: leaves: 32511622 accum: 32966630 Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.