Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:29:20 12/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2001 at 06:36:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 04, 2001 at 05:07:13, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>How does (Deep) Junior 7 do here? >> >>Note that the plys that Junior reports seem to be different from those >>in other programs. 15 ply may be 'not much' in its terms. >>It's certainly very fast! I would like to see Gromit output on this position >>too. >> >>-- >>GCP > > >Junior7 p800(32 mbytes hash) finds that h4 is 0.01 pawn better than h3 after 1 >second at depth 12. > >I am not sure if h4 is a winning move and I am not sure if h3 is not winning so >I am not impressed. > >New position >[D]r5k1/4R1pp/2b2q2/2Bp4/p1p5/P4P2/1P1Q2PP/6K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 7: > >1.f4 Re8 > ± (0.74) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Bb4 d4 > ± (0.81) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Qd4 Re8 2.Qxf6 > ± (1.08) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Qd4 Qg6 2.Qe5 > ± (0.97) Depth: 6 00:00:00 1kN >1.Qd4 Qg6 2.Qe5 Qb1+ 3.Kf2 Qc2+ 4.Kg3 Qg6+ 5.Kh3 Qh6+ 6.Kg4 > ± (0.72) Depth: 9 00:00:00 40kN >1.h3 Rb8 2.Qe3 Qg6 3.Qe5 > ± (0.84) Depth: 9 00:00:00 72kN >1.h3 Rb8 2.Qe1 Qg6 3.Re6 Re8 4.Be7 Qf7 5.Qe5 > ± (0.78) Depth: 12 00:00:00 358kN >1.h4 Re8 2.Rxe8+ Bxe8 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Qxc4 Qxb2 5.Qd5 h6 6.Kf1 > ± (0.79) Depth: 12 00:00:01 1102kN >1.h4 h5 2.Qe1 Qg6 3.Re6 Re8 4.Rxg6 Rxe1+ 5.Kf2 Be8 6.Rxg7+ Kxg7 7.Bd4+ Re5 >8.Bxe5+ Kg6 > ± (0.78) Depth: 15 00:00:08 5595kN > >(Blass, Tel-aviv 04.12.2001) > >Uri If the position is correct so I am not impressed. I wanted to make things clear because the title sound like other programs are better than Junior7 and I did not mean it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.