Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 07:40:39 12/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2001 at 10:34:00, K. Burcham wrote: >Analysis by Deep Junior 7: > >1.Qd4 Re8 2.Qxf6 > ± (1.08) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Qd4 Qg6 2.Qe5 > ± (0.97) Depth: 6 00:00:00 1kN >1.Qd4 Qg6 2.Qe5 > ± (0.97) Depth: 6 00:00:00 1kN >1.Qd4 Qg6 2.Qe5 > ± (0.97) Depth: 6 00:00:00 1kN >1.Qd4 Qg6 2.Qe5 Qb1+ 3.Kf2 Qc2+ 4.Kg3 Qg6+ 5.Kh3 Qh6+ 6.Kg4 > ± (0.72) Depth: 9 00:00:00 38kN >1.h3 Rb8 2.Qe1 d4 3.Re6 Qf4 4.Rxc6 > ± (0.86) Depth: 9 00:00:00 60kN >1.Qe1 Qg6 2.Qe6+ Qxe6 3.Rxe6 Bd7 4.Re7 Bf5 > ± (1.00) Depth: 9 00:00:00 110kN >1.Qe1 Qg6 > ² (0.70) Depth: 12 00:00:01 401kN >1.h3 Re8 2.Rxe8+ Bxe8 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Bd4 Qc6 5.Qg5 Qg6 6.Qc5 Bf7 7.Qc8+ Bg8 > ± (0.87) Depth: 12 00:00:01 679kN >1.h3 h6 2.Qe1 Qg6 3.Re6 Re8 4.Rxg6 Rxe1+ 5.Kf2 Be8 6.Rxh6 Kf7 7.Kxe1 > ± (0.72) Depth: 15 00:00:03 6959kN >1.h4 Re8 2.Rxe8+ Bxe8 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Bd4 Qe7 5.g4 Bf7 6.Qe5 Qxe5 7.Bxe5 Bd5 > ± (0.89) Depth: 15 00:00:08 12013kN >1.h4 Re8 2.Rxe8+ Bxe8 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Qxc4 Qxb2 5.Qf4 Qf6 6.Qb8 Qe6 7.Kf2 Kg8 >8.Bd4 Kf7 > ± (0.88) Depth: 17 00:00:17 37913kN >1.h4 Re8 2.Rxe8+ Bxe8 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Qxc4 Qxb2 5.Qf4 Qf6 6.Qb8 Qe6 7.Kf2 Kg8 8.h5 >Kf7 9.Qf4+ Qf6 > ± (0.89) Depth: 19 00:01:12 158609kN >1.h4 Re8 2.Rxe8+ Bxe8 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Bd4 Qe7 5.Bc3 Qe3+ 6.Kh2 Qf4+ 7.Kh3 Qc7 8.h5 >Qd7+ 9.Qxd7 Bxd7+ 10.Kg3 > ± (0.86) Depth: 20 00:04:08 548621kN >1.h3 Rc8 2.Ra7 Qf5 3.Qc3 Bd7 4.Bd4 Qf7 5.Bxg7 Qxg7 6.Qxg7+ Kxg7 7.Rxd7+ Kf6 >8.Rxd5 Rb8 9.Rd2 Ke5 > ± (0.88) Depth: 20 00:06:16 690438kN Hehee! Junior switches away from h4 and only finds it again after a long thought, so 36 seconds is still the time to beat. That is, assuming there are no alternate solutions, and there may very well be. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.