Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why using Zobrist keys for Pawn Hasing?

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 03:21:17 12/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 06, 2001 at 05:45:12, Gerd Isenberg wrote:

not bad, but when i used pawn hashtable i used zobrist and
i when i checked at 1 hour a game i had 0 mishits.



>in my current implementation i use the difference of the black and white pawn
>BitBoards mod nEntries (which i learned here is not so smart) for indexing the
>pawn table - with nEntries is a prime > 50000. The entries are quite large with
>a lot of BitBoards in it for pawn properties such as backward, isolated, open
>and passed. They also include the original pawn BitBoards for black and white
>for verification. I use a replacement sheme, that checks up to four consecutive
>entries - the one with the lowest ProbeCount will replaced.
>There are no ep- neither side to move information in my pawn hash table.
>
>The hit rate seems to be OK 96%-99.9% - but anyway i should redesign the whole
>thing.
>
>Gerd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.