Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 00:53:59 12/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 07, 2001 at 01:16:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: >my numbers seem to match yours. IE 2-4 secs on my laptop is about 1M >nodes or so. Some positions made this climb, some made it go down a bit. >I didn't try WAC, I annotated some games that went all the way to 3 piece >endings (KR vs K and KQ vs K) to see the spread on the number of bad pawn >hashes. > >Didn't fail once with 64, but failed badly with 32. However, a tree with 1M >nodes is amazingly robust and seems capable of surviving such a random spike >in the evaluation with little in the way of bad side-effects. Amazing... I am so confused here, 1M pawn nodes???? Are you getting that many different pawn positions? I don't see why probing the same positions over and over should result in collisions, so... >But when I introduce a small bug, it all goes to hell instantly. :) -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.