Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 13:14:39 12/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2001 at 13:14:07, Thorsten Czub wrote: >in his usual way, without knowing anything, without researching for anything. >shallow. unmotivated. but driven to be negative: Don't sell yourself short ;-). >no evidence. for YOU ?! :-)) >how do YOU want to measure that ? >by studying numbers appear on your autoplayer ? No, haven't got one. >asking somebody ? Nope. >"it's not even the latest version" ?! >whats this ?? >you think any latest thing is better because it is newer ??? Nope. But I do know that: 1) No evidence of improvement over the previous version. 2) According to Frank Quisinsky, which have been testing most of the Zarkov versions, the strength hasn't improved compared to previous editions. 3) Not an overwhelming performance by Zarkov 4.5v in the tournament arranged by Leo Dijksman. Whether 4.5T is worse or better than its successors is difficult to estimate, but I imagine that the author has hopes in that general direction. And if 4.5T was that incredible then why was 4.5u and 4.5v released. >what a miracle. Amen! >no ! aha. > >bravo. > >talking without knowing. without seeing. >without facts. >without a chance to find out whats going on. snip <facts> The only surprise, and a mild one at that, was against Yace. Otherwise nothing to shout about or even remotely significant enough for your speculation. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.