Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 05:52:59 12/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2001 at 04:29:10, Thorsten Czub wrote: >no evidence of improvement YOU would be able to measure with your prejudices. I don't have any prejudices. That's the advantage of fact over opinion. >why not. if he didn't know himself, he continues programming. >i know a few programmers who are unable to find out about the strength of their >versions. the normal procedure they do is let version x run against x+1. >this way of course you cannot measure the progress between 2 versions. Well, it's a fair assumption that no less than two new versions within a short timespan indicate some sort of dissatisfaction. And it's a certainty that you're unable to evaluate strength by your methods. So a crystal ball would be more effective. >nobody can help you. you are far from this stage. a blind prophet in a desert, >waiting for the rain to come. Amateur attempts at proverbs don't change the facts. And for your information, a prophet isn't dependant on 20/20 vision ;-). Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.