Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:32:20 12/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2001 at 08:52:59, Mogens Larsen wrote: >I don't have any prejudices. any human beeing has prejudices. only you don't tell them in public. nobody can live and judge anything without having prejudices. only god has no prejudices. >That's the advantage of fact over opinion. the fact that you talk about games you haven't seen. >Well, it's a fair assumption that no less than two new versions within a short >timespan indicate some sort of dissatisfaction. And it's a certainty that you're >unable to evaluate strength by your methods. So a crystal ball would be more >effective. when my methods are wrong, why was i succesful in finding out that hiarcs would be world chess champion BEFORE the championship was played out. when it is wrong, why was i able to see that chess tiger is very very strong, without even the programmer (christophe) knowing and believing it. when my method is wrong, how can i see in forward that century is very strong, and century makes 2nd rank, and how can i find out about cstal ? and about nimzo? all i see is that you claim that you do not replay games, hear about strength from hearsaid, and call other methods lousy. when in fact you don't know about the programs. instead of finding out yourself by researching, you call other people idiots and their methods wrong. of course it is nonsense to test version x versus version x+1. this does not lead you to a better chessprogram. instead of showing your incompetence in evaluating chess programs you should better do something senseful.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.