Author: pavel
Date: 15:28:12 12/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2001 at 18:03:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On December 09, 2001 at 16:24:57, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On December 09, 2001 at 15:34:10, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On December 09, 2001 at 14:22:02, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Here is one of my most recent match at Game in 1 Hour per side against Novag >>>>Turquoise USCF Estimated rating of 2294. The match is still running with a small >>>>advantage for Novag. >>>> >>>> >>>>Date: 9/12/2001 >>>>White: Novag Turquoise H8 RISC 26.6 MHz USCF 2294 >>>>Black: Gambit Tiger 14.6 Handspring 33 MHz (Not Overclocked) >>>>Opening: C43 Petrov: Modern Attack, Symmetrical Variation >>>> >>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. Nxe5 Nd7 6. Qe2 Nxe5 7. Bxe4 dxe4 8. >>>>Qxe4 Bd6 9. f4 Bf5 10. Qxf5 Nc6 11. Qe4+ Qe7 12. Qxe7+ Nxe7 13. Kf2 O-O-O 14. >>>>Nc3 Bb4 15. Na4 b5 16. a3 Ba5 17. Nc3 c6 18. Ne2 Rhe8 19. a4 b4 20. Re1 Bb6 21. >>>>c3 Nd5 22. a5 Bc7 23. Bd2 bxc3 24. bxc3 Re4 >>> >>> >>>I don't understand what your point is. This opening is not losing. So why do you >>>give this game as an argument for a bigger opening book? >>> >>>Would a bigger opening book help here? >>> >>> Christophe > > > No a bigger opening book in this case doesn't help, but CT 14.6 for palm in >most of the games that I matched against Novag Turquoise, seems to barely >managed to come out of the opening stage fighting to equalize and this should >NOT be the case, since the opening for the Novag was prepared 5 years ago. Also >you can not compare the merely 8,000 moves for CT 14.6 against any of the >Novag Computers openings. It is clear that CT 14.6 is a better program than >WChess was 5 Years ago. And using comparable hardware such as in this case, >there should be an enormous rating difference. So clearly the simple advantage >of a better program is NOT sufficient. Therefore, you need to catch up in the >area where the others are leading such as Pocket Fritz. > > >Pichard what do you expect on a palm? pavs >> >> >>I don't know if there is a problem at all by the openingsbook >>But still I have 1 question is the original Tiger openingsbook to big for a >>handheld? >> >>And you must not look if it can be draw out of an openingsbook >>You have to use the openingsbook to win! >> >>In a human point of vieuw you have to look at this at openingsbooks >>espacialy from the White side because of the extra tempo >>If a position after the opening ends with = the opening is a failure. >>While from the Black side if after the opening the position is = the opening is >>a sucses everything it has more is good and should have a higher valeu of >>contempt it most of the time also contributes why certain moves should not be >>played by one side >>As long if only the 100% line is folowed (though this is not always the case >>after folowing for example the deepfritz book >>Judit Polgar tried to win her advanced chess match in this way too.) >>Folowing the 50% line then is nonsens. >> >>Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.