Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:41:28 06/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 1998 at 11:56:05, blass uri wrote: >>Or else, and as things are now, it would be possible to consider the >>SSDF list as more of a world championship for commercials than the ICCA >>events. > >I do not agree because there are non commercial programs in the SSDF >list >for example Junior4.0 on a slow machine was in the SSDF list >and the newest commercial programs(for example Junior4.6) >are not in the last SSDF list. >The older programs do not have a fair conditions in the SSDF list >and have slower machines and it give an unfair adventage to new >programs. Icca championships are live. There is a control structure that makes sure (or should) that nobody cheats. Amateurs are supported. It is a competition that cannot be took over by ONE company, since many companies and interest are focussed together, each has the right to complain and to demand for a request and change. The ssdf-list has no control structures, no tournament director, no democratic control-structures where each interest group can complain. No - you are talking about completely 2 different things enrique. The one is SPORT, with all implications. The other stuff (ssdf) is NOT sport.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.