Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My win against Century 4

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 13:17:18 12/10/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 10, 2001 at 14:03:15, Peter Berger wrote:

>On December 10, 2001 at 13:50:13, Marc van Hal wrote:
>>>>Any problem with 2. Nf3 ?! Really curious ..
>>>>
>>>>pete
>
>>I only see this as trolling these days
>>And I don't see any reason to respons deeper on this
>>
>
>My question was quite serious. Yes, I would be _very_ surprised to see something
>wrong with 2.Nf3 but I am always eager to learn.
>
>>Because the reasons are givven over and over and over again.
>>But if you want to play stuburn go ahead but don't expect any answers in the
>>future on this sort of questions.
>
>I haven't seen any analysis or ideas provided by you on 2. Nf3 in this forum
>that explained why it should be taken out of the opening book of chessprograms (
>and , please, I can't know about your emails to kasparovchess you mentioned in
>other posts) . I for one would be interested very much to discuss your ideas
>here.
>
>Friendly greetings,
>pete

Ok here a quick hint a because of indeed the Grunfeld defense it was only that
Kasparov did play the same position like he did before but I already posted why
it was not good Building up the presure on the centre with eventualy a Rd8 gives
black a small advantage
But the postings of the Grunfeld also where made on icd
It is not my fold that you can't find them again.
The Junior6 book can help you out if you look carefuly

but the second reason is that after d4,d5 2.Nf3,e6
The knight also stands wrongly placed to hold the advantage
if you want to contineu with the idea of Nc3 and Bg5
And other idea after Nf3 then could be
Not playing Bg5 and Nc3 but Nd2 b3 Bb2
But if black plays it corectly White will loose the advantage here too
And I don't make postings anymore I rather sell them.
So atleast my work gets the credit it deserves
Also maybe I am now blowing a litle high from the tower but I do not think you
are qualefied to make deep going anelyzes
Curently I am working on this but it will take at least 1 more year when I am
finished.






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.