Author: Gareth McCaughan
Date: 16:31:10 12/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2001 at 18:27:39, David Hanley wrote: > I've actually used both acl 4.3 and the latest CMUCL. Mostly ACL4.3 > for the diagnostics, though CMUCL makes considerably faster code. Its "notes" are also very helpful once you get to the stage of speeding up your code. At least for the declaration-insertion part. > I haven't tossed in (speed 3)(safety 0) or any type declarations yet; > I'll wait until it plays decently first, and i've reduced the consing. Is consing really making a big difference to your speed? (Hazy memory says this is less likely with ACL than with CMUCL; mostly because ACL's GC is very good, though the excellence of CMU's code generation may also have something to do with it.) -- g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.