Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: World championship titles

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 04:12:29 06/07/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 04, 1998 at 23:41:10, Komputer Korner wrote:

>On June 04, 1998 at 21:33:49, Steven Schwartz wrote:
>
[mega snip]
>
>>As the jury was walking back into the room after a total of
>>45 minutes of deliberation, one of the jurors turned
>>to me, smiled, and gave me a thumbs-up. The case was such a farse
>>that the jury saw right through it.
>>
>>Fidelity did not care so much about the long term ill effects of
>>rating exaggeration. They are no longer.
>>- Steve
>
>Perhaps Fidelity knew they would lose the case but in doing so would
>cause your firm irreparable harm from having to defend it. I am sure
>that your attorney insurance went up. So who wins here? The lawyers and
>judges and court reporters and court stenographers feeding off society's
>trough. Every legal case boosts employment for the above if the case
>goes to trial. The fact that your case wasn't thrown out beforehand
>leads to a thought that judges and lwayers are in on a conspricy to
>inflate the number of court cases thus keeping all the above principles
>employed. There are 2 ways to oblivion. The fast way by revolution which
>leads to Robespierre forms of government and the slow way via the legal
>system. It seems that the U.S. is definitely well on its way to oblivion
>via the 2nd method. Because the law societies of Canada do not allow
>plaintiffs to make a % deal with their lawyers, Canada does not have the
>ridiculous number of lawsuits that the U.S. has. I don't know why this
>is the case as it certainly limits employment opportunities for lawyers
>in Canada. Perhaps there is a gentleman's agreement between the powers
>that run the "STAR CHAMBER" in Canada. The U.S. society however is
>certainly on the legal road to HELL.

I think that the difference in Canada is that the entity that loses the
case is responsible for the other entity's legal fees.  This prevents
many frivolous lawsuits, because if a person or company is innocent,
suing them is only going to cost you money.

I'm not a laywer though, and I make no warranty of accuracy or fitness
for a particular purpose of this message. <g>

Dave Gomboc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.