Author: Günther Simon
Date: 06:04:13 12/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2001 at 08:16:01, Jouni Uski wrote: >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >DUAL-P3-933 2001 ,WBEC1-AmCom >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1. Gandalf 4.32h **** 1==0 1111 11== 1=00 111= 1=00 1110 1110 1110 24.5 > 2. WBNimzo2000b 0==1 **** 1==0 1=00 11== 1100 111= 11== 1111 11=0 23.5 > 3. LambChop 10.88 0000 0==1 **** 11=0 1100 11=0 1=00 111= 11== 1=== 19.5 > 4. Yace 0.99.56 00== 0=11 00=1 **** 1==0 ===0 1110 11=0 11=0 11== 19.5 > 5. Comet B.37 0=11 00== 0011 0==1 **** 1000 11=0 ==00 111= 1111 19.5 > 6. Crafty 18.12 000= 0011 00=1 ===1 0111 **** =000 1110 11== 11== 19.0 > 7. Zarkov 4.5v 0=11 000= 0=11 0001 00=1 =111 **** 1=00 1=00 1==0 16.5 > 8. Capture_R1 0001 00== 000= 00=1 ==11 0001 0=11 **** 1000 1110 14.5 > 9. Phalanx XXII 0001 0000 00== 00=1 000= 00== 0=11 0111 **** 11=0 13.0 >10. Patzer 3.51 0001 00=1 0=== 00== 0000 00== 0==1 0001 00=1 **** 10.5 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Some thoughts (note this is not blitz but 40/40): > >1. Commercial programs rule here: Gandalf + Nimzo (no TB support!) >2. Comet and LambChop are better than Crafty!? >3. Zarkov's new paradigm is not so stunning... > >Jouni Hi Jouni, I believe one cannot say "Comet and LambChop are better than Crafty!?" and I am pretty sure you know this ;) ( yes I saw the "!?") The margin between No 3-6 in this tournament is only a ridicolous 1/2 point (out of 36 games) so we can say with some caution at least that they seem to be of equal strength at this time control and under that conditions. Best regards, Günther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.