Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 07:35:07 12/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2001 at 08:16:01, Jouni Uski wrote: >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >DUAL-P3-933 2001 ,WBEC1-AmCom >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1. Gandalf 4.32h **** 1==0 1111 11== 1=00 111= 1=00 1110 1110 1110 24.5 > 2. WBNimzo2000b 0==1 **** 1==0 1=00 11== 1100 111= 11== 1111 11=0 23.5 > 3. LambChop 10.88 0000 0==1 **** 11=0 1100 11=0 1=00 111= 11== 1=== 19.5 > 4. Yace 0.99.56 00== 0=11 00=1 **** 1==0 ===0 1110 11=0 11=0 11== 19.5 > 5. Comet B.37 0=11 00== 0011 0==1 **** 1000 11=0 ==00 111= 1111 19.5 > 6. Crafty 18.12 000= 0011 00=1 ===1 0111 **** =000 1110 11== 11== 19.0 > 7. Zarkov 4.5v 0=11 000= 0=11 0001 00=1 =111 **** 1=00 1=00 1==0 16.5 > 8. Capture_R1 0001 00== 000= 00=1 ==11 0001 0=11 **** 1000 1110 14.5 > 9. Phalanx XXII 0001 0000 00== 00=1 000= 00== 0=11 0111 **** 11=0 13.0 >10. Patzer 3.51 0001 00=1 0=== 00== 0000 00== 0==1 0001 00=1 **** 10.5 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Some thoughts (note this is not blitz but 40/40): > >1. Commercial programs rule here: Gandalf + Nimzo (no TB support!) >2. Comet and LambChop are better than Crafty!? >3. Zarkov's new paradigm is not so stunning... > >Jouni Statistical significance is a good thing. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.