Author: Harald Faber
Date: 15:18:28 12/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2001 at 12:09:22, Christophe Theron wrote: >Babel Fish Translation, In English: > Which impression did Fritz 7 leave with this Spiessrutenlauf against the >strongest competition? Hiarcs 7,32 was copied smooth. The balance of +5 = 4 -1 >reflects the process again, it was a play on a gate. In the match against junior >7 both parties shone by outstanding attack guidance. By a dubious initialization >version in the 5. Round took Fritz a defeat more than junior. Also with junior ã >Fritz had its problems. Fritz could not win the match despite three victories in >consequence at the beginning, junior ã struck back in the last six portions with >5:1. Positionelle of barley courses had junior first disadvantages given, only >the fourth portion marked the turn. Fritz ' victory in the sieved portion fits >the others, but the five victories juniors showed one like changed playing >junior. After already with the Shredder 5.32-Test Fritz 7 with 7.5-2.5 the upper >hand kept, it could succeed also this time. 6,0-4,0 the result, altogether thus >13.5-6.5. Shredder had led after five portions still with 3:2, but four clean >victories in consequence tilted the match. ChessTiger 14 proved as expected as >hard nut. There were only two portions, which were terminated in fewer than 60 >courses. In this match there was two very impressing portion, round two and >round four, absolutely sequels! Between Fritz 7 and GambitTiger 2 it proceeded >balanced, as it can more balanced hardly be. From ten portions full eight ended >remis, the other two won once Fritz and once GambitTiger. Somewhat more of the >play had GambitTiger, advantages could meanwhile not be constituted. For me >surprisingly the match Fritz 7 against GambitTiger 2 ended aggressively with >6.0-4.0. Surprisingly, because in my large tiger comparison test this tiger >version actually proved as somewhat stronger than the other tiger versions. Who >knows, how the result reads after 50 or 100 portions, but when Fritz was >situated in front after six portions with 5.0-1.0, wunrderte myself I already >somewhat. But tiger could operate 3,0-1,0 in the last four portions by still >good result correction. It can recapitulatory be said that Fritz plays according >to my opinion fewer wildly, for it more founded. With fewer wildly it is here >meant that Fritz for open figure play accepts not directly each attenuation of >the own farmer structure. But the forward urge became more pronounced. Fritz 7 >is still no GambitTiger and also still no junior, but then Fritz in next place >already comes concerning attack urge and balance of the attacks. I also imagine >myself to be able to detect a better free farmer handling. Within the final game >area there is definitely progress, e.g. on the basis the fourth portion against >ChessTiger 14 (mentioned like already above) is recognizable. I doubt that older >Fritz versions would have won this final game, then also still against the final >game king tiger. Scarcely 53% erspielte itself Fritz 7, 37 points from 70 >portions. 20 portions of it were played with the " old " D-CC VERSION, against >Hiarcs 7,32 and junior 7, the remaining 50 with the newer version Fritz 7a. That >is not a berauschendes result, with this competition however no disappointment. >Against the tigers 50%, only against both junior there was knappe a defeat in >each case. In view of that still quite few portions are predicates about the >play strength by far do not found enough, in order to be able to show halfway >secured realizations. Two different kinds is however clear: 1. Fritz 7(a) is not >a over flier. Despite only 70 portions it is not to be assumed that after 500 or >1000 portions well over 60% by Fritz 7(a) are erspielt. 2. Fritz 7(a) had a >substantially more interesting play style than the previous versions and begins >slowly to play chess. I was in former times never a Fritz friend, that was me >Kloetzchenschieber and pfuscher always too much. But since DeepFritz is >obviously frays rotten on the correct way. DeepFritz has one rech
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.