Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:30:21 12/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2001 at 04:25:02, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >I believe that if fritz did not see after an hour that it is losing there is >probably no simple win for black. I never said it was simple. >Yace(only material) also can see nothing in few minutes after 1.Bxe4 and it says >that white has an advatage of a rook for a bishop. Here, I believe the analysis of the GM's and not the analysis of the programs. Set your programs pondering on the NOLOT set [tough ones], LCT II [tough ones], and WAC 230. Let them run for a week, for a month, for a year. Tell me if they ever solve them all. To say that a program ran all night and did not find the answer does not change the true answer, whatever it is. Programs can be right, and GM's can be right. Neither is clearly superior. I think it to be true though, that program analysis is much more consistent than GM analysis. A program will probably make a lot of brilliant deep tactical choices. But it seems that they still don't make any brilliant positional insights.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.