Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Who is the better chess program author?

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 09:54:51 12/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2001 at 11:48:26, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On December 12, 2001 at 22:33:15, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On December 12, 2001 at 21:14:13, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On December 12, 2001 at 20:38:08, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>[snip]
>>>>Well... I'm still trying to find an example of important contribution by a GM
>>>>for Tiger.
>>>
>>>Interesting.  You don't use any test positions, or gather data from online play,
>>>I take it.
>>
>>I don't gather data from online play. I have never logged onto a chess server
>>myself.
>>
>>I do use test positions. Do you consider that as an important contribution from
>>GMs?
>
>It's a way of transferring their knowledge into the chess program.  I think for
>most chess programmers, it is very important in the beginning of the project and
>becomes less so as the project moves along.  I am working on a test set which I
>think will be more helpful in the long run.  It will be called "Quiet Test"


Using test positions is very different from having a strong chess master
employed as part of the team creating the chess program, which I think is more
directly relevant to the original question.  (I agree it's pretty hard to create
a very strong chess program with no strong human input of any sort -- even test
positions from human games -- anywhere along the way!)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.