Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 16:07:09 12/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2001 at 18:47:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Tiger in this respect is hell more interesting. tiger1 to 2 was a big >step forward obviously. Of course i won from tiger2 because of the same >things as how i won from tiger1, but that doesn't take away that it's >more interesting to see it play. Of course it makes huge stupid positional >errors, which i won't post here of course fearing next version will fix >them. Like i posted once some things which are in half of all engines now. I think that your contribution is welcome , so why are you afraid to post it ? It's a primary CCC goal to help programmers exchanges. Anyway, thank you very much for your feedback. Otello.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.