Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 13:07:46 12/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2001 at 15:25:40, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >On December 15, 2001 at 14:25:28, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On December 15, 2001 at 14:10:05, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>UCI seems like a good idea. It certainly fixes some of the problems that >>>winboard has, and add some cool features. But are there any free interfaces that >>>support it? >> >>Not AFAIK. >> >>>I am thinking of implementing UCI in Chezzz, but for what purpose? >> >>Well, that's a decision of a personal nature. If it isn't interesting or >>challenging for you then there's no reason to do it. You could say that it would >>make your engine more accessible outside WinBoard. Especially by the release of >>Shredder 6. But not by much. >> >>>I am not going to buy Shredder just to get the GUI. Will there ever be a UCI >>>version of Winboard? >> >>A tough question to answer. >> >>>Maybe I should make a freeware UCI GUI myself. Seems like a >>>task that is undertakable. >> >>That sounds like a good idea. Let me know if you want moral support :-). >> >>How is the rewrite of Chezzz progressing? >> >>Regards, >>Mogens > > > >I too have been thinking of implementing both ends of this UCI thing. > >Regards, >Matthias. Please do this.I was betatester of the UCI-betatest of gambit-soft and like the UCI stuff very much. TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.