Author: Mark Young
Date: 13:28:46 12/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2001 at 16:19:02, Sune Larsson wrote: >On December 15, 2001 at 15:59:21, Mark Young wrote: > >>*** >>*Re: How many of you think that current chess Programs can beat Zhu Chen >> >>The only program I feel that has a chance to lose is GambitTiger 2.0. This >>program can play over the top sometimes and lose in the endgame against good >>chess players. I know people like GambitTiger 2.0 style of play, but it does >>come with some risk in a short 5 game match.* >>*** >> >>I do not understand why Christopher Theron prefers GT 2.0 to ChessTiger in >>style. I know people like attacking chess, but good solid chess will always >>prevail when playing humans. IMO > > In the 3 games played, it has not been Tiger attacking... But we'll see - > Emanuel likes challenges, so if there's a tougher opponent like ChessTiger, > Junior 7 or Fritz 7?! - he sure is ready...(between the tournaments of course). No, the style is and can be attacking in GambitTiger 2, But GT2 can be downright stupid when playing strong humans. I don't see this in ChessTiger 14, That is why I have always felt that ChessTiger 14 is the better program. Regardless of the SSDF rating. I have seen to many games, even against weaker players where GT2 loses the thread of the game. It just can not handle as many positions as well as ChessTiger 14. IMO > > Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.