Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger 2.0 vs IM Berg 2500

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 16:37:46 12/15/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 15, 2001 at 19:29:45, Andrew Smith wrote:

>On December 15, 2001 at 16:12:06, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>On December 15, 2001 at 15:25:59, Andrew Smith wrote:
>>
>>>Nice game, Sune! :) It is good that you can find a strong player who looks like
>>>he is playing 100% seriously, and without any special anti-computer techniques!
>>>This player will soon become a Grandmaster maybe!? Not many games can be found
>>>at this tournament time control as most games on the internet are quick blitz
>>>games. These games are really something special!
>>>
>>>Regards, Andrew
>>
>>
>> Nice response, thanks ;-). If there is interest I can ask Emanuel if it's
>> possible to publish more from the games (maybe even whole games)?! I know
>> Emanuel since he was a kid, and he's a very special, natural talent - and has
>> never studied any opening books - or chess books whatsoever. Instead he has
>> learned by practical play. E is totally fearless, like when he was 15 and
>> declined an early draw offer from GM Bagirov in Viking Games - and went on
>> to win it in 27 moves... Yes, he will be GM for sure. In the latest SWE-ch and
>> Bundesliga, E was just half a point from the GM-norms. And now he has reached
>> the point where preparation is needed... Most famous players he has beaten so
>> far are: GM Sokolov 2659, GM Speelman 2623 and GM Hansen 2619.
>> Coming tournaments for him are Hastings and Bermudas. But first he wants
>> to beat Gambit Tiger in a match... ;-)
>>
>> Sune
>
>If it is possible for you to get all the games, then of course it would be
>wonderful to see! If he doesn't want it than there is no problem of course. It's
>really more interesting to see strong programs against strong humans than to see
>computer-computer matches, which are usually quite boring in most cases.
>
>As for your choice of engine I have to say that chesstiger 14.0 would be better
>suited to humans. Gambit can quite often go off track as I have seen in some
>games, and tiger is better all-around IMO. But of course, the choice is up to
>you, they're all strong enough to give him a challenge for sure :)
>
>Regards, Andrew


 Ok, Monday he will face the solid Tigger brother, playing white - hmm
 that means 1.e4 and ???



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.