Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:19:13 12/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2001 at 09:43:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 15, 2001 at 11:13:18, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>Interesting results for Rebel.It seems most commercial programs are tactically >>beeter than Fritz. > >These positions say something about whether an engine has turned on >mating extensions, NOTHING about tactical strength. seeing mates is part of the tactical strength(most of the tactics is not about mates but saying that mate extensions are not relevant for tactical strength is not truth. > >Black wins anyway here. > >Note that i'm also not so impressed with the tactical strength from >fritz if you consider its search depth, but it doesn't take away >that for practical game play mating extensions are not relevant! > >Best regards, >Vincent I believe that they are relevant Tiger14.7 for the palm is using them and I understood that it is one of the reasons that it is better than tiger14.6 for the palm. It is better not to use them than using them in the wrong way but it does not mean that they are not relevant for games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.