Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:14:30 12/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2001 at 06:47:31, Harald Faber wrote:
>On December 16, 2001 at 06:40:46, Sergei Smith wrote:
>
>>On December 16, 2001 at 06:07:40, Harald Faber wrote:
>>
>>>A horrible, desastrous result for Shredder 6: 1.5-8.5 vs. Fritz 7a is crushing.
>>>(Game #11 ended draw)
>>>I haven't found the time to take a closer look at the games.
>>>
>>>Currently Shredder 6 - Junior 7: 1.5-0.5
>>>
>>>Games etc. like always available at www.harald-faber.de
>>
>>Shredder may be stronger at longer time settings, at time settings of 1 move in
>>3 minutes. I'd try those.
>
>Did you read the match conditions? I doubt that. I am testing 40/120+60.
:) :) :)
That's an automatic answer: when program X performs badly, the automatic answer
is that you should have played at longer time controls.
I know a lot of programs (actually all the ones that are not close enough to the
top of the SSDF) that are supposed to play much stronger at longer time
controls.
One thing I don't understand: nobody ever complains the opposite. I mean: when
was the last time you have heard "you should have played faster time controls"?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.