Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:12:01 12/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2001 at 23:14:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >On December 16, 2001 at 06:47:31, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On December 16, 2001 at 06:40:46, Sergei Smith wrote: >> >>>On December 16, 2001 at 06:07:40, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>A horrible, desastrous result for Shredder 6: 1.5-8.5 vs. Fritz 7a is crushing. >>>>(Game #11 ended draw) >>>>I haven't found the time to take a closer look at the games. >>>> >>>>Currently Shredder 6 - Junior 7: 1.5-0.5 >>>> >>>>Games etc. like always available at www.harald-faber.de >>> >>>Shredder may be stronger at longer time settings, at time settings of 1 move in >>>3 minutes. I'd try those. >> >>Did you read the match conditions? I doubt that. I am testing 40/120+60. > > > >:) :) :) > >That's an automatic answer: when program X performs badly, the automatic answer >is that you should have played at longer time controls. I just expected that in the meantime really everyone knows that I *exclusively* test with tournament time control. >I know a lot of programs (actually all the ones that are not close enough to the >top of the SSDF) that are supposed to play much stronger at longer time >controls. Actually I know two programs where this is correct: Junior 7 and Shredder. Especially Shredder is a phenomenon. The g/180 results are much worse for Shredder than 40/120+60. >One thing I don't understand: nobody ever complains the opposite. I mean: when >was the last time you have heard "you should have played faster time controls"? > > Christophe Because in faster time controls only Fritz wins. ;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.