Author: Matthew williams
Date: 07:13:26 12/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2001 at 10:02:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On December 17, 2001 at 09:46:36, Slater Wold wrote: > >>I didn't read most of the posts, I apologize. But anyone who could beat a >>program blindfolded should be able to win at least 1 5/7 game in 7 games or so. > >The program he defeated blindfolded wasn't/isn't commercial. He mentioned Zibi, >so it was probably Pharaon. > >>I like Vince, although I think he can be a little arogant at times. The thing >>that I was laughing at, is that he was going on and on about how horrible >>Shredder is against humans, and how weak it is. Losing in 18 moves isn't really >>proof of that. > >Well, he made two statements IIRC. The first one was that he claimed to be able >to defeat commercial programs at a reasonable timecontrol. And secondly, that he >would lose convincingly if he tried his usual style. Your example games are the >opposite of both claims IMO, so they're not relevant to the question at hand. >The Shredder claim notwithstanding. > >Regards, >Mogens His post was very relevent to my Original Post, since I said that Vincent Brags and makes false claims, in Slaters example he claims how weak Shredder is against Humans, yet he can't demonstrate one win, you have to be a Moron not to see Vincent is a Joke, I guess your a Moron?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.