Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 07:50:32 12/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2001 at 10:23:01, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On December 17, 2001 at 10:13:26, Matthew williams wrote: > >> His post was very relevent to my Original Post, since I said that Vincent Brags >>and makes false claims, > >In your original post you specify the false claims to be related to the claims >about Tiger. Hearsay and blitz games are not really relevant. > >>in Slaters example he claims how weak Shredder is >>against Humans, yet he can't demonstrate one win > >Claiming that Shredder is weak against human opposition and being able to prove >it in person are two different things. > >>,you have to be a Moron not to >>see Vincent is a Joke, I guess your a Moron? > >Someone would certainly make that claim. And if preferring Vincent's colourful >and optimistic claims to a troll like you is moronic. Well, then I'm a moron. > >Regards, >Mogens But if you had taken notice on his previous coments you could have seen Vincent was drunk when he made that post I yesterday only forgot to say tht it was not fair to beat on crafty on a moment it was obvious that Robert was not there I am sure he otherwise would have givven coments on Bxh2 in the Game Century 4 played against Hiarcs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.