Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:02:56 12/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2001 at 11:41:26, Marc van Hal wrote: >Giving a program to a G is verry stupid >You simply could see it like this >Kasparov and Kramnik sit on the board >Kasparov Asks: Kramnik what move will you make after this move >Kramnik answers:I am going to make this move And what do you do if kramnik says: I am going to play 1.e4 with probability of 40% 1.d4 with probability of 30% 1.Nf3 with probability of 20% and 1.c4 with probability of 10% Note that kramnik can answer like this not only in the opening but also in the middle game because programs do not have to be deterministic. I think that kramnik should get the program before the match only after proving that the program can beat him in a fair match but after computers prove that they are better than humans at fair conditions there is a point in a match in unfair conditions. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.