Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 17:51:48 12/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2001 at 20:47:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On December 17, 2001 at 20:29:52, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On December 17, 2001 at 20:07:20, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>I wonder if Rebel 4 is solving these positions much faster, since Beyond a >>>P III 800 MHz there doesn't seems to be much benefit at all. Also how fast are >>>others programs solving these positions using comparative hardware. >>> >>>http://www.rebel.nl/bench.htm >> >>I don't understand. The link shows a pretty old benchmark for Rebel 10. >>Furthermore, the gains in speed for solution times seem completely proportional >>for the Kryotech 1 Ghz. What exactly is the gripe? >> >> Albert > >Yes the Benchmark is probably 2 years old, but comparing the performance gain >from a Pentium III 800 Mhz and a Kryotech 1 Ghz ( which was an Athlon using a >special cooling systen like a refridgerator which allowed the Athlon to be >overclocked) was only 2 points gain. Now the question is does Rebel Century 4 >proportionaly show an increase in performance, or does it truncate when it >reaches certain microprocessor speed.? PS: I am just trying to see how much can Rebel Century 4 benefit from using an XP 1900+ for the upcoming match against Van Wely.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.