Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 04:31:02 12/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
>96-99% is incredibly high - it's hard to believe, actually. I'd gladly post the sources, but...nope ;) I had thought that 95% is a normal figure but it seems to be high, I'm not complaining though! I checked the code and it seems to OK: I increase moves_searched after I have really searched a legal move (futile and illegal moves don't count as they are not searched) and then I increase FailHighCount and FirstMoveFail counters as necessary. And now I removed the code from qsearch, which might have biased the figures (well, it didn't). I'm using PVS and SEE (the latter of course has a great impact on move ordering). >Could you post the test position you're using? It's the position after 1.e4 e5 2.d4 d5: [D] rnbqkbnr/ppp2ppp/8/3pp3/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 >It would also be nice to know if >these numbers are repeatable over a large set of positions. I have not yet implemented test suite processing, but I can test individual positions of course. From initial position, the percentage was 94%. Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.