Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:38:48 12/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2001 at 07:35:31, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On December 19, 2001 at 18:33:34, Hansjoerg wrote: > >>Test conditions: >>Athlon XP 1700+, 15min + 10sec games, Fritz GUI, 132hash for each program, >>programs used own books, TB activated >> >>The result: >>Fritz 7.0.0.2-Shredder 6, Blitz:15'+10" +46/-26/=28 60.0:40.0 >> >>(Under same conditions Fritz 7.0.0.2 scored over 70% against Junior 7.0) >> >>Next pairing is Shredder 6 against Junior 7. > >Shredder 6 is not the best blitzer whereas Fritz 7a might just be the best >blitzer on the market right now, maybe you should concider adding some time when >testing Shredder 6? I suspect that it can be a good idea only if he adds time only to shredder6 and not to Fritz7. I suspect that if he adds time to both engines shredder is going to continue to lose games. 15 10 on a fast PC is not what I call blitz inspite of the fact that it is faster than tournament time control. It is 25 minutes per game if you assume 60 moves per game. Is it possible under chessbase GUI to give more time only to one engine? If it is not possible then it is clearly a disadvantage of the interface because I believe that a match with ponder off when Shredder6 gets twice the time that Fritz7a gets may be interesting. In this case it is not clear which side is going to win when it seems clear that Fritz7a is going to win every long match against Shredder6 with equal conditions when the time control is not important. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.