Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 10:51:55 12/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2001 at 11:44:57, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On December 20, 2001 at 10:35:33, Severi Salminen wrote: > >>>Which is also incredibly high. Esp. without hashtables. >> >>I tested with a few other positions and I allways get something between 94%-96%. >>It will be interesting to see if hashtables will improve this even more. >> >>Severi > >I wonder if your eval has something to do with this. The simpler the eval, the >higher humbers you can get, since there less "granularity" and the chances >of positions to be scored equal increase. That increases the chances to pick >the right move since the best move will have the same score as many others. Any >of this that is picked first will be ok. As an extreme, with material only, many >moves score the same. > >Regards, >Miguel That's true. I assumed he had some sort of "reasonable" evaluation. That might be wrong.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.